1 Chronicles 7:25

Authorized King James Version

PDF

And Rephah was his son, also Resheph, and Telah his son, and Tahan his son,

Original Language Analysis

וְרֶ֣פַח And Rephah H7506
וְרֶ֣פַח And Rephah
Strong's: H7506
Word #: 1 of 7
rephach, an israelite
בְּנֽוֹ׃ his son H1121
בְּנֽוֹ׃ his son
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 2 of 7
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or
וְרֶ֧שֶׁף also Resheph H7566
וְרֶ֧שֶׁף also Resheph
Strong's: H7566
Word #: 3 of 7
resheph, an israelite
וְתֶ֛לַח and Telah H8520
וְתֶ֛לַח and Telah
Strong's: H8520
Word #: 4 of 7
telach, an israelite
בְּנֽוֹ׃ his son H1121
בְּנֽוֹ׃ his son
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 5 of 7
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or
וְתַ֥חַן and Tahan H8465
וְתַ֥חַן and Tahan
Strong's: H8465
Word #: 6 of 7
tachan, the name of two israelites
בְּנֽוֹ׃ his son H1121
בְּנֽוֹ׃ his son
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 7 of 7
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or

Analysis & Commentary

Genealogical Significance: This verse appears within the Northern tribes and their heritage section of Chronicles' genealogical framework. The Hebrew term שֵׁבֶט (shevet) - tribe/scepter is central to understanding this passage's purpose. The Chronicler, writing to post-exilic Israel (c. 450-400 BCE), uses these genealogies not merely as historical records but as theological statements about covenant continuity and divine faithfulness.

The genealogical structure serves multiple purposes:

  1. establishing Israel's connection to God's creatio n plan from Adam
  2. legitimizing post-exilic community's claim to covenant promises
  3. emphasizing Judah and Levi's special roles in God's redemptive plan,
  4. demonstrating that despite exile, God's covenant purposes continue.

The selection and arrangement of names is intentional, highlighting All Israel included in God's covenant.

Chronicles diverges from Genesis and Samuel-Kings in its genealogical presentation, reflecting the Chronicler's distinct theological agenda. Where earlier texts focus on narrative history, Chronicles emphasizes continuity, legitimacy, and hope for restoration. This verse contributes to the larger argument that the post-exilic community is the rightful heir of God's ancient covenant promises.

Historical Context

Post-Exilic Context: The Chronicler wrote during the Persian period (450-400 BCE) to a community returned from Babylonian exile, struggling with identity and purpose. These genealogies answered crucial questions: Who are we? What is our relationship to ancient Israel? Do God's promises still apply to us?

The historical setting influences the text's emphasis on Northern tribal genealogies: Issachar, Benjamin, Naphtali, Manasseh, Ephraim, Asher. Ancient Near Eastern cultures valued genealogies for establishing land rights, royal legitimacy, and tribal identity. Chronicles' genealogies served similar functions while adding theological depth. The inclusion of specific names and details reflects the author's access to temple archives, royal records, and earlier biblical texts.

Archaeological evidence from Persian-period Judah shows a small, struggling community centered around Jerusalem and the rebuilt temple. The genealogies reinforced their connection to the glorious past and provided hope for future restoration through God's covenant faithfulness.

Questions for Reflection